The Promise of Technology in the Classroom Demonstrated in University Science Classes

As teachers, we know that if we can engage our students in the learning process, everyone wins. Engaging students in their learning necessarily means interactive teaching methods. These are the methods that have the students think and do during the lesson. Engaging the student in learning also means that we need to be able to follow their learning continuum and adapt our teaching approaches in response to this path (AKA: assessment for learning). Individualizing the learning for each student in a class of 30 is already a challenge. Individualizing the learning in a class of 300 is more than a challenge. But that is what we expect in undergraduate education. And in some schools – they are finding solutions.

Solution: Technology in classrooms

But like all educational tools, they are only as effective as their appropriate use.

There are  a number of studies and initiatives that demonstrate useful approaches and effect on student engagement and learning using technology in the classroom. Recently, a study from the University of British Columbia (UBC) was published in a top  journal . A study on 2 physics classes was conducted. Each class had over 250 students. The researcher compared the amount of learning students experienced when taught by traditional lecture and when taught using interactive activities. The interactive class had no formal lecture. Instead the instructor guided the +250 students through a series of activities including paired and small-group discussions and active learning tasks using remote-control “clickers” to provide feedback for in-class questions.

Not surprisingly, there was a difference. Some of the findings:

  • Attendance improved by 20% in the interactive class
  • Student engagement doubled in the interactive class
  • Students in the interactive class scored almost twice as well on the physics test

Interactive teaching approaches make a difference. But how and when to incorporate interactive technology in teaching is not always self-evident to all teachers. Especially when a teacher has not received support on how to deliver interactive lessons.

The Carl Wieman Science Education is a 5-year ($12M) project that targets improving undergraduate science education. In addition to research on effective practices, the group has and continues to produce useful resources for science instructors including an Instructors Guide to the Effeffective Use of Personal Response Systems (Clickers) in Teaching and a series of video clips to support instructor learning.

Interestingly, but not surprisingly, the effect of these voting devices in the classroom is not about the use of technology. It is about how and why this technology is used that makes them effective. So once again – it relies on the teacher developing their lessons with the student at the center.

Advertisements

One thought on “The Promise of Technology in the Classroom Demonstrated in University Science Classes

  1. Implementing classroom technology requires planning and research. the focus should be on how to increase student achievement, engagement and transforming the way teachers teach.

    EduEval and SMART Technologies share similar views.
    I took the liberty of posting your article on my twitter page. Hope its ok with you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s