Educational Evaluation in the Middle East: A Public & Private Responsibility

Last week, two very different events placed educational development in the foreground of discussions in the Middle East.

GCES

In Oman, the Gulf Comparative Education Society (GCES) symposium was held at Sultan Qaboos University. Researchers, educational experts, and policymakers focused on bridging the policy & research divide in education in the GCC. Knowledge was shared on how to improve educational practices, schools and programs to promote student learning and achievement.

In Dubai, the Global Education and Skills Forum (GESF), co-organized by UNESCO, the UAE Government, the Varkey GEMS Foundation, and the Commonwealth Business Council was held at the Atlantis Hotel. Heads of state, business leaders, educational experts, and international organization officers discussed the potential of Public-Private  Partnerships (PPPs) to address the growing needs of education globally.

Although the venues, presentations, and discussions focused on very different aspects of education, it might not be surprising that the common core elements were rooted in student learning and achievement for all.

At GCES, most presentations focused on the potential impact of various solutions. One presentation in particular was notable to EduEval because of its explicit focus on the use of evidence for decision making. The KHDA from Dubai presented their work in analyzing the data from inspection reports, international assessments (i.e., TIMSS 2011 & 2007), and enrollment trends to better formulate responsive strategies and policies for the Emirate. On a different scale EduEval presented its Year 1 results of an 8-country impact evaluation on the use of a Learner-Response Device (a technology that promotes Assessment for Learning) in science classes in the Middle East.

At GESF, most presentations focused on redefining PPPs in education. As one Head of State explained, when private education provides schooling, it is in the interest of the public; a concept that might not be as shocking in nations struggling to meet the MDG2 (universal primary education) as private operators offer solutions of schooling for $5/month. This model seems to be an absurdity to those who think of the private school model as further promoting inequities rather than a solution to the divide between the rich and poor.GESF

Interestingly, the take-away from both conferences was the marked absence of regular and systematic evaluation within the education sector for successful models to become scalable and serve the needs of the children, parents, and society. Andrew Adonis summarized the bottom line eloquently when he stated that evaluation is needed for the proof of impact of the for-profit sector on what works better than the public approaches in education! A thought reflected by KHDA as they will continue their work with a greater focus on educational research in collaboration with various organizations.

But where is the private sector in proving the worth of their solutions WITH evidence of impact on student learning and achievement?

Although there is a movement in the Gulf countries to systematize monitoring and evaluation (e.g., General Education Evaluation Authority, Saudi Arabia), the message was clear last week:

More monitoring and evaluation is needed sooner rather than later.

The responsibility lies with both the public and private sector.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Educational Evaluation in the Middle East: A Public & Private Responsibility

  1. I fully agree there is an urgent need to activate monitoring and evaluation, and it is the responsibility of the private and public sector, but is there an open channel to allow experienced qualified educators participate?

    • Majeda, I think you are raising an important point. Qualified educators should have part in the monitoring and evaluation. It is possible to learn from other countries’ mistakes and not to repeat them. Instead of having different sides all should find away to work together to present clear and accurate evaluation that will guide decision making.

  2. Effective monitoring and evaluation are essential to inform planning for the future. We could do more to collaborate with public and private sector to share best practice, and co-operate in the successful application of monitoring and evaluation systems.

  3. Perhaps it is more than a matter of sharing best-practices. Perhaps it is a question of creating the conditions for the private sector to take responsibility for the educational solutions that they provide for a public good – much like in health.

    If the private sector is to benefit from the educational marketplace that is making room for them (or being made to make room), then it is reasonable to expect that assurances for the public of a certain minimum standard of quality. If they private sector does not voluntarily move in this direction as they push through with solutions to the “public problems” – then it is up to the public to construct mechanisms of accountability that will ensure no harm is done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s